“Let food by your medicine and medicine be your food,” Hippocrates.
Hippocrates, regarded as the father of medicine, must be rolling over in his grave seeing the GMO expansion throughout our food supply. With GMOs come massive amounts of pesticides and hazardous fertilizer toxins, certainly the death of bees and escalating incidences of disease are not merely coincidence. Food is no longer natural, and GMO foods that contain toxins certainly wouldn’t be endorsed by Hippocrates.
The DARK Act stands for Deny Americans the Right to Know what’s in our food. Is this ethical or moral? Why can’t we be allowed to know what’s in our food? This act specifically applies to GMO (genetically engineered food ingredients) and is backed by the GMO lobbyists and manufacturers (Monsanto, Bayer, Dow, Dupont, Syngenta).
If these foods are harmless as industry and the FDA claim, then there shouldn’t be an issue in letting us know which foods contain them. Clearly this is an attempt to protect industry rather than the health of Americans. Over 64 nations throughout the world require labeling or ban GMOs outright; don’t we in the United States at the very least deserve to have labeling? Stand up for your and your family’s (and your pets health) today: tell your Senators to oppose the DARK Act.
Top 10 Reasons To Oppose The Senate DARK Act:
reprinted courtesy of EWG Environmental Working Group
This week, the Senate Committee on Agriculture will consider a new version of the DARK Act. The House of Representatives has already passed legislation blocking your right to know what’s in your food.
Here are the top 10 reasons to oppose the Senate version of the DARK Act:
- Americans have a right to know – Nine out of ten Americans want the right to know what’s in their food and how it’s grown – regardless of age, income or even party affiliation.
- 64 nations have GMO labeling – Two-thirds of the world’s consumers – including citizens of Russia and China – have the right to know whether their food contains GMOs.
- Voluntary labeling won’t work – Food companies have been able to make voluntary GMO and non-GMO claims since 2001, and consumers are more confused than ever. The Senate DARK Act would actually make it harder for companies like Campbell’s Soup to voluntarily disclose the presence of GMOs.
- Consumers want clear labels, not codes – Nine out of 10 consumers want GMO labels on the package, not high-tech gimmicks.
- Food labels help correct confusion — Federal rules already require many disclosures to alleviate consumer confusion, ranging from “orange juice from concentrate” to “imitation crab.”
- No patchwork quilt – State GMO labeling laws are virtually identical, so there will be no “patchwork” quilt of different state laws. Besides, states already require state-specific food labels for everything from “cottage foods” to butter and cheese grading.
- GMO labels will not increase food prices – Food companies change their labels all the time. Studies show that GMO labels will not act as a warning. Even Campbell’s Soup agrees that GMO labeling will not increase food prices.
- GMO crops increase weed killer use – The widespread adoption of GMO corn and soy has led to an explosion in the use of the weed killer glyphosate, which is linked to cancer. Thousands of schools and churches are in the zone of crops routinely sprayed with glyphosate.
- Farmers support gmo labeling – One-third of harvested acres are not genetically engineered but are threatened by drifting pollen from GMO crops and pesticides. No wonder the National Farmers Union and other farm groups support GMO labeling.
- We don’t need GMOs to feed the world – Studies show that simple changes – such as reducing food waste and using fertilizer and water more efficiently – would do much more to feed the world than GMOs. What’s more, conventional crop yields are keeping pace with GMO crop yields.